Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

Poetry (1)

Saturday, June 28th, 2008

It’s probably nothing new for our British folks, but “Eloisa to Abelard” is one of the most amazing poems I’ve ever read. Divine, erotic and tragic: a perfect trinity that is fulfilled by this wonderful work by Alexander Pope.

I come, I come! prepare your roseate bow’rs,
Celestial palms, and ever-blooming flow’rs.
Thither, where sinners may have rest, I go,
Where flames refin’d in breasts seraphic glow:
Thou, Abelard! the last sad office pay,
And smooth my passage to the realms of day;
See my lips tremble, and my eye-balls roll,
Suck my last breath, and catch my flying soul!

If only every man of faith thought like that…

Sunday, February 10th, 2008

It’s rare to listen to a politician going so deep inside the “religious vs. secular” question. There’s the chance that this is purely strategic, but I want to believe (I really do) that one of the forerunners in the american presidential election is capable of such a clearness of mind.

Blasphemy…

Friday, February 8th, 2008

is probably one of the most irrational concepts developed by the human being. And it gets even worse when we convince ourselves we have the right to “correct” it.

I won’t even waste my energies commenting on this…

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

“Water” by Deepa Mehta

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

One of the most amazing films I’ve ever seen. Perfectly fits with the pictures of India that I’ve been collecting through Rushdie’s works, in the last years.

Stallman at CERN

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

On Monday, Prof. Richard Stallman visited CERN. I attended his lecture on “The ethics of free software”, and I must say I loved it. I had seen one of his lectures 4 years ago, back at FEUP. At the time, Free Software was still a growing passion, and Stallman was quickly adopted as the example of the great philosopher (and developer) who changed the world.
Today I see him as a front figure of the FLOSS movement, always trying to reinforce the “F”, sometimes losing some points because of some of his private obsessions (this “GNU/Linux vs. Linux” history), his extreme opinions (the idea that there should be no proprietary software at all), and his lack of hesitation when it comes to talk politics. In the other hand, I find the ideas of GNU and FSF completely true, mainly those who concern about individual freedom and access to information.

Benedict… again…

Sunday, September 17th, 2006

Finally, I was able to read the the entire speech of Pope Benedict XVI, given at the University of Regensburg. Well, there are some conclusions to be drawn from it:

  1. As expected, Benedict is far more “theological” than John Paul II. The speech is very rational, being centered on the close relationship between Christian and Greek philosophies. It’s clearly a theological opinion, not a pastoral letter or indication. Benedict clearly wants to remain as a theologian, in spite of his new functions.
  2. The polemic citation, although perfectly harmonious with the rest of the text (and, consequently, his position), was clearly a bad option, because
    • It messes with Islam… so, it’s potentially dangerous (doesn’t he remember the cartoons?);
    • It criticizes Islam… It’s insane! In my opinion, a religious leader should be more careful with the examples he picks.
    • It refers to a period when both Islam and Christianity practiced the art of bloodshed pretty extensively;
    • It refers to the Byzantine empire, highly attacked by the Crusades.
  3. The Pope, being a religious leader, is supposed to abstain from certain practices, such as actively criticizing the fundamentals of other religions.
  4. In addition, Ratzinger is no longer the great theologian, neither the grand inquisitor. Now, he’s supposed to have a neutral opinion in what concerns to inter-religious dialogue. I mean, “neutral” inside the catholic church - he’s not the conservative Opus Dei supporter, neither Küng’s former fellow… he’s the Pope. He’s supposed to reflect the opinion of the church as a whole.

As usual, an infinite stream of nonsense keeps happening through the world…

Benedict…

Saturday, September 16th, 2006

Quoting wikinews, my comments are written inside square brackets []:

Pope Benedict XVI criticises Prophet Muhammad’s teachings [wow…]

September 13, 2006

During a theological lecture at the University of Regensburg, in Bavaria, Pope Benedict XVI criticized the idea of jihad. He opined that the mujahideen idea of jihad “went against the nature of God”. The Pope said “Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul”.

[Yeah, he’s right… there’s been a long time since the Crusades… killing people for God is no longer OK!]

He quoted, without agreeing or disagreeing, Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos, who, on the “issue of jihad, holy war”, said,

[Manuel was the Byzantine Emperor from 1391 to 1425, he was in fact the last byzantine emperor. Why? Well, because the 4th crusade messed up the whole empire… and then they got conquered by the ottoman turks.]

“Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached”.

[Wow… this citation was, no doubt, carefully picked. It’s so descriptive of the Muslim faith (in the opinion of Benedict, at least)…]

The Pope also criticized the Western world for alienating other cultures and “excluding God”.

[”Alienating other cultures”? But did not the guy just say that islam is all about murdering other people (sic)? And now he’s criticizing the western world for alienating such a religion?]

[end of citation]

Well, Benedict is obviously learning the art of gaffe.

Back from Taizé

Thursday, August 24th, 2006

taize1.jpg

Here I am, after 16 days away from the technological civilization. The funny thing is that not in a single moment I missed anything similar to a computer. That may seem odd, but I found it very healthy.

Lost in the meadows of Burgundy, France, the small village of Taizé is, since 1940, the home of the community of Taizé, a monastic order unique for its “culture of the provisory” and advocation of christian reconciliation. Everyone is welcome to Taizé, as long as he/she agrees to respect difference. That means that Taizé is an ideal place for the survival of multicultural and multiconfessional (and sometimes inter-religious) dialogue. The lifestyle is very simple, either for those who live there (brothers, and other people who stay there for years) and for those who decide to spend one week, two weeks or even months of their vacation time. Meals are simple yet nutritionally complete, and most people live in tents or barracks, during their stay in the community. The “Church of Reconciliation” is the perfect example of versatility of the community: blind-like walls separate the greatest part of the building in small rooms, used for the activities, and, at the time of the prayers, the walls are raised and the capacity of the church suddenly rises to 5000 people. There aren’t any benches, but only carpeted floor, where people sit, lay or kneel, according to their will.

Taizé impresses for its respect in what concerns to different cultures and creeds. Although the community is targeted to christians, it’s not very hard to find someone who is an agnostic or atheist, passioned by the lifestyle and communitarian sense that we find there. The eucharist is celebrated in the catholic way, and the prayers are based on biblical readings and reflexion, very much in the evangelical manner. The chants spread from soft english-spoken to more latin compositions, crossing the territory of J. S. Bach, and borrowing many elements (and even complete songs) from the orthodox tradition. There are songs in english, french, german, portuguese, romanian, spanish, catalan, italian, polish, lituanian, greek… well, Taizé is the only place in France where most people don’t know french. Although it is the “official” language of the community, and despite being the one used for conversations between the brothers, most young people prefer to use english. However, the brothers always make sure that everyone understands what’s happening, either by translating themselves or asking someone to do it.

It’s been more than one year that Fr. Roger, the founder of the community, died in disturbing circumstances, during the night prayer. The echoes of that unexpected death are, as expected, still audible. People want to know what happened, why it happened, if what was presented in the newspapers was really true… well, one year after, it looks to me as a senseless act of a distorted mind. It may happen to anyone of us… in both sides of the story. The loss of Fr. Roger was inevitable, as with any other human being. The circumstances of his death may look unfair, provided that he was not the head of a movement or the advocate of any revolutionary idea… Roger Schütz-Marsauche is often compared to Mother Theresa. In the time when he was able to, he would live for some time among people who deal with poverty everyday. Taizé has brothers all around the world, working with unfavoured populations. During the second world war, several jews found a safe place in Taizé, and after the war, the community would receive german prisoners of war in sundays. In the other side, although he rejected to formulate new theologies, Fr. Roger was a front figure of the ecumenical movement. He was an advocate of christian unity, and believed that love could easily surpass differences. It’s a pity that most clerical figures cannot achieve the same clearness of thought.

Well, I believe I have managed to share my always-evolving opinion about the community of Taizé and its lifestyle. Maybe next time I’ll stay for a little longer time. Thank you for your attention.

Have fun…

Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Dawkins

Saturday, July 8th, 2006

Yesterday, Tom gave me a link to a Google video, containing the famous two-episode documentary “The Root of All Evil”, by Richard Dawkins. Coincidence (or not), I’m just reading through Dawkins’ “The Selfish Gene”, a famous book which theorizes about the nature of altruism, among other things.
The documentary brings nothing new to the masses. Dawkins does not surprise those who know him: he looks to religion as a virus, a dangerous disease that lasts for thousands and thousands of years.
Analyzing this “virus” through the scope of evolution, we may speculate that it’s a matter of survival of the fittest: if most of the human beings have that tendency towards religion/superstition, and even considering they are wrong, we must admit that this “virus” survived easily among its competitors. Whether it’s a “genetic” or “conceptual” “virus”, it has managed to survive and grow: the adoption of religion by humans seems to be a benefit. Well, of course religion helps raising anger in some people’s hearts. Politics have the same effect… even football has the same effect! Why wouldn’t something so important as religion fit as an excuse to kill? OK, it’s stupid, I know! But killing someone because of its football team is even more stupid!
However, I share some worries with Professor Dawkins… For instance, the growth of religious education in the western world is one of the points that I find really “frightening”.
Everything else, Professor Dawkins, is exhageration. Religion, superstition and irrational thought are inevitable. I find things that 90% of the world’s population believe in just ridiculous… But not everyone has my education… even less people have Richard Dawkins’ education… and, yet, we know nothing…

FLOSS and Christianity

Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

Today, I found an article on Slashdot, about the relation between Open Source and Christianity. It’s a curious fact, as I was thinking about writing an article on the matter. The idea of sharing your work with the community, let them improve it and share it with others, and so on and on… is, to my eyes, very similar to the core of christian doctrine. In my opinion, christian organizations should be aware of these questions. Maybe in the future we’ll have a real Saint IGNUcius :). Amen…